Skeptologic

Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out.

Archive for April, 2008

Pseudoscience on the Science Channel

Posted by skeptologic on April 27, 2008

Last week, I criticized Walgreen’s for selling unscientific, untested supplements (Airborne and Homeopathy) in their store. It was particularly disturbing to see these items being sold in the legitimate pharmacy where I go when I need real medicine. Last night, I was disturbed to see pseudoscience on The Science Channel. It wasn’t one of their programs, but rather on a commercial during the program. The commercial was for Dr. Frank’s No Pain Spray. They claimed that the spray would cure pain from Arthritis, Stiffness, Fibromyalgia, Carpal Tunnel, and a lot more. The commercial was also littered with personal testimonials. The ability to cure multiple conditions and anecdotal evidence is what peddlers of pseudo-scientific crap use when there is no real evidence that their product works. But as it turns out, I didn’t even need these red flags to activate my Baloney Detection Kit (thank you Carl Sagan). Right away they tout it as “Dr. Frank’s Homeopathic joint and muscle pain relief.” Ah, homeopathy. I reserve the highest amount of ridicule for this type of alternative medicine. It’s bad enough that they are able to get away with selling people a small bottle of water as medicine for $19.95, but to see this promoted on the Science Channel was very very disheartening. Please watch the very entertaining video below of James Randi describing just how stupid homeopathy is. Oh, and by the way “Dr.” Frank, James Randi has $1,000,000 for you if you can prove your snake oil works. Not that you need it, I’m sure you’ve made much more than that by bilking plenty of people out of their hard earned money by selling them tiny bottles of water.

Posted in Alternative Medicine, Pseudoscience | Tagged: , , , | 1 Comment »

100% All Natural Nonsense

Posted by skeptologic on April 25, 2008

As I’ve mentioned before, one of my pet peeves is the word natural when used to market products. The word seems to be everywhere these days. I see it on television commercials for food products, baby formula, soap, cosmetics, pretty much everything. As I walk down the aisle at the grocery store it is unavoidable on package after package. What it is about that word that makes every company want to slap it on their products? What exactly does it mean? I can understand if that means you would rather eat a peach off the tree instead of from a can, or if you want real blueberries in your muffin instead of an artificial thing that looks like a blueberry. However, I think the misuse and overuse of this word is causing some misconceptions in our society.

People seem to have the idea that if a product is natural that somehow that means that it can’t hurt you. In popular culture the words “all natural” have become synonymous with “perfectly safe.” This is simply not true. There are many things in nature that are very harmful and would not make good products for human consumption. I’ll throw out a few ideas. How about a skin cream made from poison oak. It’s all natural. Or a lotion made from the toxin of the Golden Poison Frog. One milligram of this poison is enough to kill 10 to 20 humans. It’s all natural. Anyone want to drink some mercury or eat some lead? They’re all natural. Anyone want a nasal spray loaded with the influenza virus? It’s all natural. There are countless plants, fungi, bacteria, viruses, and poisons found in nature that will kill you. Now of course I am not saying that every product being marketed as natural is unsafe, but just because something is natural should not give you a warm fuzzy feeling that whatever it is will not harm you.

So what exactly is the harm that this way of thinking can cause? A few years ago I read a new story about a teenage girl who nearly died after ingesting a plant that someone told her could get her high. I’ll never forget the quote from her in the report. She said something like “It was all natural so I didn’t think it would have any chemicals in it.” There sure is a lot wrong with that statement. It shows a frightening example of how a lack of basic science knowledge can be dangerous. Everything is made of chemicals, even us. Humans are mostly Hydrogen, Oxygen, Carbon, and Nitrogen, for example. Air is a chemical, and so is water, get the idea? What matters is if the chemicals in question are toxic or not. It makes no difference if the compounds are found in nature or created in a lab.

This misguided notion about natural being automatically better is what is leading many people to unproven alternative or naturopathic medicine. Bottom line: Herbs are drugs. There is nothing special about them that makes them safer or better than drugs that have been tested and approved by the FDA for safety and efficacy. If an herb contains a compound that can heal something, wouldn’t you rather be sure that you are getting the right dose? Wouldn’t you rather be sure that what is in on the label is exactly what is in the bottle? Wouldn’t you rather know about any potential side effects and drug interactions? The next time someone who is not a doctor offers you something as a potential cure and says not to worry because it’s “all natural,” just remind them “so is arsenic.”


Posted in Alternative Medicine | Tagged: , , | 4 Comments »

Skeptologists Trailer is up!

Posted by skeptologic on April 22, 2008

Brian Dunning has posted the trailer for the skeptologists, check it out!

Posted in Skepticism | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Airborne – Does the settlement go far enough?

Posted by skeptologic on April 19, 2008

Last month the makers of Airborne settled their lawsuit with the nonprofit Center for Science in the Public Interest. The suit charged that the company used deceptive advertising, implying that their concoction of herbs and vitamins was a cure for the common cold, or that it would protect you from a “germy” environment. Their so called clinical trial turned out to be a two person operation set up specifically for this product, involving no doctors or scientists. This got me to thinking about another product I had seen sitting on the shelf at Walgreen’s when I was picking up my prescription of real medicine. The product is Wal-Borne, the generic Walgreen’s version of Airborne. I wondered what would the impact be on their product, could Walgreen’s be sued as well? I checked their website for Wal-Borne and could not find it. Could Walgreen’s be taking the high road and voluntarily stop selling this fake cure? I decided to stop by my local Walgreen’s to check. I didn’t even have to go in the store, as I walked by, there was a huge display in the window of Wal-Borne, on sale for $5.99.

I thought to myself, how can they get away with this? Then again, Airborne was still on the shelves, so what gives? Well, it turns out that they can still sell it because they have changed their claims. Under the Dietary Health and Supplement Act (DSHEA) manufacturers of herbal supplements are allowed to make vague “structure and function” claims about their products. And that is exactly what they did. They now make the vague and medically meaningless claim that it “boosts the immune system.” That phrase has become rather ubiquitous in our society these days. Unless you have a disease or condition that compromises your immune system’s proper function, good nutrition, exercise, and rest are all that are needed for a healthy immune system. For an excellent explanation about how “boosting your immune system” is bunk, click here and listen to what Dr. Mark Crislip has to say about it on his podcast.

I have heard a lot of people posting to message boards that they are not going to seek refunds from Airborne, and that they stand by the product and will continue to use it because it has worked for them. They say things like “I took it and I did not get a cold!” or “If I take Airborne my cold lasts only three days instead of five!” This is an example of confirmation bias from uncontrolled tests. How do you know you would not have gotten a cold if you didn’t take it? How do you know how long your cold was going to last? How do you account for the placebo effect? You can’t. These personal testimonials are no better than Airborne’s fake clinical trial. In order to test if it really works, a double blind trial with an adequate sample size and proper scientific controls it needed. But Airborne will never submit to a proper test, because they know the product will fail. They will be content to keep making their millions on the immunity boosting nonsense.

Many will contend that there is no harm done by the product, it’s just herbs and vitamins they say. First of all, herbs are drugs. They can have side effects like any other medicine. Don’t be fooled into thinking that they are somehow safe because they are natural (Blah, all natural is the most misleading marketing buzzword ever, but that is a subject for another post). As far as vitamins, large doses of vitamins can be toxic, especially vitamin A. One pill of Airborne contains 100% of the recommended daily allowance of Vitamin A, two pills will get you up to the safe limit 10,000 IU, and the instructions tell you to take three a day. Combine this with the Vitamin A from your food, and possibly a multivitamin which a lot of people take, and this can be very dangerous. Please be careful of what you put in your body. Your doctor can tell you if you are deficient of a certain vitamin or mineral and need to supplement that. Don’t waste you money on supplements if it is not medically necessary.

The fact that any schmuck, oh excuse me, school teacher (as if that gives it any credibility) can throw together a bunch of vitamins and crap, with no scrutiny from the FDA, make vague claims and take your money for a useless and unnecessary product is ridiculous. The real problem is that this is allowed under the DSHEA. This act seriously needs to be looked at by congress. As for Walgreen’s, they are a legitimate pharmacy and should know better. They ought to ashamed of themselves. Then again, I shouldn’t be surprised as they do also sell homeopathic “remedies,” but that is a subject for another time.

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Tagged: , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Disgusting Propaganda

Posted by skeptologic on April 12, 2008

I was disgusted, absolutely disgusted when I heard what was being claimed in the new creationist propaganda film”Expelled” starring Ben Stein. There are two main ideas they are pushing in this film. The first is that mainstream science if trying to suppress criticism of the theory of evolution. This is just a flat out lie. It is an easy claim to refute for anyone who knows anything about how science works. Any scientist who studies evolution, or any other scientific theory for that matter, criticizes the theory all the time. That is their job, that is how science works. One of the qualifications of a scientific theory is that it is falsifiable. This means that you must be able to set up experiments that, if they fail, would disprove the theory. Evolution has withstood every test that has been thrown at it. The problem with the idea of creationism and so called “intelligent design” is that they are not science, they are religion. Once you propose a supernatural explanation for something, you have stepped out of the realm of science and into the realm of personal belief and speculation. Proponents of intelligent design know this and have tried distance their idea from religion and the word creationism so they can teach it in science class. The ironic thing is that in Expelled, they make no effort to cover up their religious beliefs. Their idea is more suited to a mythology class.

The other theme of the movie is very disturbing, offensive, and just plain stupid. This is where they try to say that “Darwinism” (they use that term for evolution) leads to atheism and then to Nazism. They are trying to blame the holocaust on evolution. Again it is the same old tactic of trying to paint atheists as horrible people with no morals or ethics. There is one problem here, Adolf Hitler was not an atheist, he was a Catholic. Now I am not saying he ordered the killing of all of those people because he was religious, but he was certainly not an atheist. The makers of Expelled are basically saying that we should not believe in the theory of evolution because some people might take that idea and do bad things with it. This is a logical fallacy known as the argument from final consequences. Let’s put that into perspective. By their twisted logic, we should not believe in the theory of gravity because someone might drop a piano on someone and kill them. Or maybe we should not believe in atomic theory because we can use it to make nuclear weapons. Likewise, because some horrible racist wackos might twist the theory of evolution does not invalidate the overwhelming evidence that living organisms evolve over time.

I am sick and tired of religious people seeming to think that they have some kind of monopoly on morality and ethics. I recently listened to the interview with Eugenie Scott on the Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe and was furious at what the makers of Expelled did. They lied to Dr. Scott and others to trick them into being in the movie. Any normal, ethical person would consider that kind of deception wrong, I know I do. Eugenie Scott is one of my favorite scientists, and although I have never met her in person, seems to be an extremely nice person. Why not do the decent thing and just ask openly and honestly? Oh yea, these people are not honest, that would be a moral value.

I encourage anyone reading this to go to Expelled Exposed to get the entire story. Let’s make that the top site when people search for the movie online. And for further evidence of their hypocrisy, read what they did to PZ Myers here.

Posted in Creationism | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Please support The Skeptologists

Posted by skeptologic on April 10, 2008

Please send an brief email to skeptologists@newrule.com to show your support for the show! One email per email address. They are trying to get 50,000 emails to show the studio that there is a demand for this kind of show.

Posted in Skepticism | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Very Excited – The Skeptologists

Posted by skeptologic on April 9, 2008

Welcome to Skeptologic.

When I heard (back in January) that Brian Dunning from Skeptoid was going to produce a pilot for a skeptical TV show called The Skeptologists, I was very excited. Then recently when the cast was announced, I was beside myself. It’s like Brian has assembled a team of skeptical superheroes! Not only did they get the host of The Skeptics’ Guide, Steven Novella, but also Michael Shermer and Phil Plait. I am so far unfamiliar with the other cast members, but can’t wait to get to know them if the show gets picked up. I think it has a really good chance. It would be a nice counterpoint to all the nonsense shows on TV these days, like Ghost Hunters (bleh!) and many others. The success of shows like Mythbusters and Bullshit have shown us that these types of shows are viable. They now have a Facebook page for the show, go check it out. The picture of them drinking wheatgrass juice is hilarious! I wish Brian and everyone associated with the show the absolute best! You have been my inspiration to start this blog and hopefully do more for skepticism in the future.

Posted in Skepticism | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »